Monday, April 24, 2006

Freedom for doctors

In backing away from all aspects of their "third way" health care reforms, the Alberta government made a huge mistake. The Alberta government once again has withdrawn proposals (which were really just bullet points, but that is neither here nor there) that might add some more competition in the health care mix.

Behind a subscriber wall at the CalgaryHerald, Mark Milke points out a couple things.

If carpenters on Calgary's new Children's Hospital site were told by politicians to forget about future government work if they ever hammered a nail on a private project, the politicians would rightly be pilloried.

But apply such logic to doctors who will soon labour in that hospital and too many politicians think it fine to restrict the labour, mobility, wages and skill development of physicians.

One of the abandoned proposals would have allowed doctors to work in the public system as well as the mythological private system. The arguments against this proposal, says Mark, are two-fold. First there's the "double dipping" critique, and then there's the argument that it will draw doctors away from the public system.

The morality and logic of such assertions is faulty. On the double-dipping charge, how does it differ from consultant Rod Love, who received taxpayer cash (via the Tory government) and cheques from the private sector? Plenty of lawyers bill government and private clients for similar work. The freedom allowed to consultants, lawyers and others is denied to doctors.

Let's whip out some numbers, shall we?

European countries and Australia (all of which also have universal access to health care) allow private insurance and much more doctor mobility between government and private systems. As a result, they have many more doctors per 1,000 people compared to Canada. According to the OECD, Canada has 2.1 physicians for every 1,000 people.

Countries with higher doctor-population ratios include: Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland.

Good stuff.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Even 'free enterprise' Alberta does not want CTF style health care! That is why Ralph was given a boot in the ass in Alberta after 'all' he has done.

One of these days, you extremists on this CTF site will realize that you are voices in the wilderness that only the most committed right wing nutbars support.

Anne Coulter said...

I really like this site! It is kewl!

Tucker Carlson said...

I love the right wing nutbars here!!!

Ghengis Khan said...

this is a good site

hefty lefty said...

I like unions because they take my dues to help give me more time to sit on my butt. Since I'm lazy and can't think for myself I appreciate having them do the thinking for me.

As for doctors it's good to keep them in the public system since I can expect longer waiting times which is good when I'm suffering in pain.

Adam Taylor said...

Thanks Anne, Tucker and Ghengis...

I told you, you'd like it!

By the way, is our privatizing the sidewalks meeting still set for this Thursday?

We are meeting at Atilla's house this week. He decided to finish his basement so maybe we can shoot a game of pool or two after the meeting.

Ghengis, I believe it's your turn to bring the refreshments.

Sask.taxpayers Federation said...

Doctors have a lot of freedom already. They like the idea of private healthcare for on reason only..............Money,.They will make more money. There are alot of millionaire Doctors working in the public system. They make over 250,000.00 a year per GP in Sask. I think Alberta Dr's might make more . Specialists make much more in both provinces.
So how much more freedom do Dr's need? I wish I had their freedom. They can speak out on any subject so who's the boss?

Anonymous said...

envy, stf, is not a pretty sight, but it's what fuels you ndp!

CTF You Tube Channel

Canadian Taxpayers Federation's Fan Box