Ever since the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in the Chaoulli case - the court case that opens the door for a parallel public-private health care system in Quebec - some Canadians have been crying "judicial activism".
If readers of the CTFs blog want an example of judicial interference, take a look at a column penned by Richard Nadler of the National Review. The column details a Kansas Supreme Court decision that ordered the state legislature to increase public school (K-12) spending by $853 million per year.
The CTF has wade into the debate as to how Canada should choose Supreme Court Justices and Senators.
Tuesday, June 28, 2005
Judicial Activism
Posted by
Tanis Fiss
at
10:18 a.m.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment